Celeron G1610T vs Xeon E3-1220 v6

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1220 v6
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 72 Watt
3.46
+312%
Celeron G1610T
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.84

Xeon E3-1220 v6 outperforms Celeron G1610T by a whopping 312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15402577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.536.67
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Power efficiency4.552.27
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date28 March 2017 (7 years ago)3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1610T has 47% better value for money than Xeon E3-1220 v6.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)72 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+-
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1220 v6 3.46
+312%
Celeron G1610T 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1220 v6 5494
+314%
Celeron G1610T 1327

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1220 v6 1215
+269%
Celeron G1610T 329

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1220 v6 3515
+504%
Celeron G1610T 582

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.46 0.84
Recency 28 March 2017 3 December 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 72 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E3-1220 v6 has a 311.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G1610T, on the other hand, has 105.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1220 v6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1610T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1220 v6 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1610T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1220 v6 and Celeron G1610T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Xeon E3-1220 v6
Intel Celeron G1610T
Celeron G1610T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 33 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1610T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1220 v6 or Celeron G1610T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.