Atom C3758 vs Xeon E3-1220 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1220 v3
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
3.27
+12.8%
Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.90

Xeon E3-1220 v3 outperforms Atom C3758 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15991665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.801.55
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.8710.98
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1220 v3 has 16% better value for money than Atom C3758.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64 KB (per core)448 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size32 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1220 v3 3.27
+12.8%
Atom C3758 2.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1220 v3 5192
+12.5%
Atom C3758 4614

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.27 2.90
Recency 2 June 2013 15 August 2017
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon E3-1220 v3 has a 12.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom C3758, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1220 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3758 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 395 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1220 v3 or Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.