Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Xeon E-2488

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.06
+57%
Ryzen AI Max 385
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 55 Watt
11.50

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Ryzen AI Max 385 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking356718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation75.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency18.1920.00
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Strix Halo (2025)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$606no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FP11
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max 385 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max 385 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max 385. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800LPDDR5X
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 8050S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max 385.

PCIe version54.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E-2488 18.06
+57%
Ryzen AI Max 385 11.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E-2488 28974
+57.1%
Ryzen AI Max 385 18441

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.06 11.50
Recency 14 December 2023 6 January 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon E-2488 has a 57% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen AI Max 385, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 72.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max 385 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Ryzen AI Max 385

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI Max 385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max 385, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.