Xeon Gold 5512U vs E-2468

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2468
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.35
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 185 Watt
37.61
+130%

Xeon Gold 5512U outperforms Xeon E-2468 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking42587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation94.2198.97
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency24.0519.44
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$426$1,230

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5512U has 5% better value for money than Xeon E-2468.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 5512U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Threads1656
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)52.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data89 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 5512U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 5512U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology22.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 5512U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 5512U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 5512U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 5512U.

PCIe version55.0
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E-2468 16.35
Xeon Gold 5512U 37.61
+130%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E-2468 26224
Xeon Gold 5512U 60329
+130%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.35 37.61
Physical cores 8 28
Threads 16 56
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon E-2468 has 184.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5512U, on the other hand, has a 130% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5512U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E-2468 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
Intel Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5512U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 5512U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.