Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Xeon E-2468

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2468
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.92
+19.9%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.11

Xeon E-2468 outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking388521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation96.15no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency24.6247.66
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$426no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/s54 MHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache24 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version5no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2468 16.92
+19.9%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2468 26870
+19.9%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.92 14.11
Recency 14 December 2023 1 October 2024
Threads 16 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon E-2468 has a 19.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, 0% more threads, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2468 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2468 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2468 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2468 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.