i9-10900E vs Xeon E-2468

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2468
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.08
+37.8%

Xeon E-2468 outperforms Core i9-10900E by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking514799
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.2210.60
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency9.877.16
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)30 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$426$488

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2468 has 185% better value for money than i9-10900E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-10900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm2206 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-10900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA17001200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-10900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-10900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-10900E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-10900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-10900E.

PCIe version53.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E-2468 15.08
+37.8%
i9-10900E 10.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E-2468 26652
+37.9%
Samples: 8
i9-10900E 19332
Samples: 11

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.08 10.94
Recency 14 December 2023 30 April 2020
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 20

Xeon E-2468 has a 37.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

i9-10900E, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

The Intel Xeon E-2468 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i9-10900E in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2468 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-10900E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
Intel Core i9-10900E
Core i9-10900E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Xeon E-2468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 12 votes

Rate Core i9-10900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-10900E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.