Core 2 Duo E8335 vs Xeon E-2456

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2456
2023, $375
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
11.74
+1794%

Xeon E-2456 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8335 by a whopping 1794% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7423011
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.04no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency15.731.51
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)3 March 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2456 and Core 2 Duo E8335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores6no data
Threads122
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.933 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz0.93 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)6 MB (shared)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm45 nm
Die size163 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2456 and Core 2 Duo E8335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700P
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt44 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2456 and Core 2 Duo E8335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon E-2456 and Core 2 Duo E8335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2456 and Core 2 Duo E8335 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2456 and Core 2 Duo E8335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2456 and Core 2 Duo E8335.

PCIe version5no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E-2456 11.74
+1794%
Core 2 Duo E8335 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E-2456 20705
+1793%
Samples: 21
Core 2 Duo E8335 1094
Samples: 23

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.74 0.62
Recency 14 December 2023 3 March 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 44 Watt

Xeon E-2456 has a 1793.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Core 2 Duo E8335, on the other hand, has 81.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E-2456 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo E8335 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2456 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo E8335 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456
Intel Core 2 Duo E8335
Core 2 Duo E8335

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2456 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo E8335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E-2456 and Core 2 Duo E8335, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.