Ultra 5 225 vs Xeon E-2436
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 225 outperforms Xeon E-2436 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 533 | 300 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 98.50 | 62.87 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 20.53 | 28.69 |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $331 | $246 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon E-2436 has 57% better value for money than Ultra 5 225.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 6 | 6 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 16 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 18 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 163 mm2 | 243 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel® Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.8 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4K @ 60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 8K @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2436 and Core Ultra 5 225.
| PCIe version | 5 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.04 | 19.62 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 7 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 10 |
| Threads | 12 | 10 |
Xeon E-2436 has 20% more threads.
Ultra 5 225, on the other hand, has a 39.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% more physical cores.
The Core Ultra 5 225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2436 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E-2436 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 225 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
