Ryzen 3 4100 vs Xeon E-2314
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Xeon E-2314 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1097 | 905 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 28.09 | 44.36 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Rocket Lake-E (2021) | Renoir (2020−2022) |
| Release date | 8 September 2021 (2 years ago) | 4 April 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | $233 | $69 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 3 4100 has 58% better value for money than Xeon E-2314.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8.00391 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1200 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Status | Launched | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Xeon E-2314 by 36% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Xeon E-2314 by 36% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon E-2314 outperforms Ryzen 3 4100 by 14% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Xeon E-2314 by 10% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.27 | 7.17 |
| Recency | 8 September 2021 | 4 April 2022 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
The Ryzen 3 4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2314 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E-2314 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 4100 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen 3 4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
