Xeon Platinum 8481C vs E-2278GEL
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E-2278GEL outperforms Xeon Platinum 8481C by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 973 | 986 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 16.80 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 20.47 | 1.99 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 11 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $519 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 112 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 105 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 1151 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.57 | 7.35 |
| Recency | 11 June 2019 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 56 |
| Threads | 16 | 112 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 350 Watt |
Xeon E-2278GEL has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and 900% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8481C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2278GEL and Xeon Platinum 8481C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
