Ultra 7 265K vs Xeon E-2276M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2276M
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.43
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.19
+401%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Xeon E-2276M by a whopping 401% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking98086
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.8194.41
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Eno data
Power efficiency15.6328.16
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date29 May 2019 (5 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 7 265K has 402% better value for money than Xeon E-2276M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1220
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size154 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA14401851
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++

Security technologies

Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2276M 7.43
Ultra 7 265K 37.19
+401%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2276M 11806
Ultra 7 265K 59072
+400%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.43 37.19
Recency 29 May 2019 24 October 2024
Physical cores 6 20
Threads 12 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E-2276M has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 400.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 233.3% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2276M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2276M is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2276M and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2276M
Xeon E-2276M
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 57 votes

Rate Xeon E-2276M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 82 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2276M or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.