Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E-2226GE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 11 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $286 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2226GE and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 154 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2226GE and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1151 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2226GE and Ryzen 5 PRO 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2226GE and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2226GE and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2226GE and Ryzen 5 PRO 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2800 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2226GE and Ryzen 5 PRO 220.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 5.85 | 7.63 |
| Recency | 11 June 2019 | 6 January 2025 |
| Threads | 6 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 has 30.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E-2226GE and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 220. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E-2226GE is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
