Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon E-2186M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2186M
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.50
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.89
+58.5%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Xeon E-2186M by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking906607
Place by popularitynot in top-10064
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.43no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Eno data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Rembrandt-R
Release date1 March 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$623no data
Current price$3048 (4.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die size149 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA-1440FP7
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics P630AMD Radeon 660M
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2186M 7.50
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.89
+58.5%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E-2186M 11598
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18393
+58.6%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 59% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E-2186M 1370
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1739
+26.9%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 27% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E-2186M 5216
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6809
+30.5%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 31% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon E-2186M 1098
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1757
+60%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Xeon E-2186M by 60% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.50 11.89
Recency 1 March 2018 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2186M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2186M is a mobile workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2186M and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2186M
Xeon E-2186M
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 56 votes

Rate Xeon E-2186M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 822 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2186M or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.