Xeon E5-2618L V3 vs E-2136

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2136
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
8.48
+20.5%
Xeon E5-2618L V3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 75 Watt
7.04

Xeon E-2136 outperforms Xeon E5-2618L V3 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9001008
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.85no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Eno data
Power efficiency10.038.88
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date12 July 2018 (6 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size154 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA11512011-3
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt75 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-1866
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2136 8.48
+20.5%
Xeon E5-2618L V3 7.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2136 13475
+20.5%
Xeon E5-2618L V3 11181

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.48 7.04
Recency 12 July 2018 8 September 2014
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 75 Watt

Xeon E-2136 has a 20.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2618L V3, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2136 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2618L V3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2136 and Xeon E5-2618L V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2136
Xeon E-2136
Intel Xeon E5-2618L V3
Xeon E5-2618L V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E-2136 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2618L V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2136 or Xeon E5-2618L V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.