Atom N2800 vs Xeon E-2136

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking888not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.92no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon EIntel Atom
Power efficiency10.03no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date12 July 2018 (6 years ago)1 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289$47

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size154 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB4.88 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics P630Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2136 13460
+2932%
Atom N2800 444

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 July 2018 1 December 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E-2136 has an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N2800, on the other hand, has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E-2136 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N2800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2136 and Atom N2800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2136
Xeon E-2136
Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E-2136 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 103 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2136 or Atom N2800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.