Celeron J1750 vs Xeon E-2134

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.95no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon EIntel Celeron
Power efficiency7.77no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date12 July 2018 (6 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$256$72

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.41 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)71 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2134 9260
+1456%
Celeron J1750 595

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 July 2018 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 71 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E-2134 has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1750, on the other hand, has 610% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E-2134 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2134 and Celeron J1750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2134
Xeon E-2134
Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon E-2134 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2134 or Celeron J1750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.