EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon E-2124

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2124
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 71 Watt
4.36
EPYC 4484PX
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
32.18
+638%

EPYC 4484PX outperforms Xeon E-2124 by a whopping 638% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1351126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.4847.62
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Eno data
Power efficiency5.7325.38
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date31 May 2018 (6 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4484PX has 208% better value for money than Xeon E-2124.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3.3 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size126 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151AM5
Power consumption (TDP)71 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2124 4.36
EPYC 4484PX 32.18
+638%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2124 6927
EPYC 4484PX 51115
+638%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.36 32.18
Recency 31 May 2018 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 71 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon E-2124 has 69% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 638.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2124 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2124 and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2124
Xeon E-2124
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E-2124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2124 or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.