A4-9120C SoC vs Xeon D-2876NT
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Designer | Intel | AMD |
Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
Architecture codename | no data | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 1 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 7 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-2876NT and A4-9120C SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 32 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 20 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | no data | 28 nm |
Die size | no data | 125 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-2876NT and A4-9120C SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA2579 | FT4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2876NT and A4-9120C SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
QuickAssist | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-2876NT and A4-9120C SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2876NT and A4-9120C SoC are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2876NT and A4-9120C SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R4E 3CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2876NT and A4-9120C SoC.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 32 | 8 |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 24 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 October 2023 | 7 January 2019 |
Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
Threads | 32 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 6 Watt |
Xeon D-2876NT has an age advantage of 4 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
A4-9120C SoC, on the other hand, has 1566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon D-2876NT and AMD A4-9120C SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon D-2876NT is a server/workstation processor while A4-9120C SoC is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.