Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon D-2766NT

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-2766NT
2022
14 cores / 28 threads, 97 Watt
14.97
+90.7%
Ryzen 3 210
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
7.85

Xeon D-2766NT outperforms Ryzen 3 210 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5221050
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency14.8026.89
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameno dataHawk Point (2024−2025)
Release date1 January 2022 (3 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-2766NT and Ryzen 3 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-cores14no data
Threads288
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data137 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-2766NT and Ryzen 3 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA2579FP7
Power consumption (TDP)97 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Ryzen 3 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-2766NT and Ryzen 3 210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Ryzen 3 210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Ryzen 3 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Ryzen 3 210.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes3214
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon D-2766NT 14.97
+90.7%
Ryzen 3 210 7.85

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon D-2766NT 24013
+90.6%
Ryzen 3 210 12599

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.97 7.85
Recency 1 January 2022 6 January 2025
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 97 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon D-2766NT has a 90.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Ryzen 3 210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 246.4% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon D-2766NT is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-2766NT is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 210 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-2766NT
Xeon D-2766NT
AMD Ryzen 3 210
Ryzen 3 210

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2766NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon D-2766NT and Ryzen 3 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.