Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Xeon D-2166NT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-2166NT
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.42
Ryzen AI Max 385
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 55 Watt
11.50
+22.1%

Ryzen AI Max 385 outperforms Xeon D-2166NT by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking884743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.46no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency10.6220.03
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Strix Halo (2025)
Release date7 February 2018 (7 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,005no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-2166NT and Ryzen AI Max 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache768 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-2166NT and Ryzen AI Max 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA2518FP11
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2166NT and Ryzen AI Max 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-2166NT and Ryzen AI Max 385 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2166NT and Ryzen AI Max 385 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2166NT and Ryzen AI Max 385. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 8050S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2166NT and Ryzen AI Max 385.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes3216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon D-2166NT 9.42
Ryzen AI Max 385 11.50
+22.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon D-2166NT 15105
Ryzen AI Max 385 18441
+22.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.42 11.50
Recency 7 February 2018 6 January 2025
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon D-2166NT has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen AI Max 385, on the other hand, has a 22.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 54.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon D-2166NT in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-2166NT is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max 385 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-2166NT
Xeon D-2166NT
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Ryzen AI Max 385

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon D-2166NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI Max 385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon D-2166NT and Ryzen AI Max 385, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.