Apple M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon D-1746TER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1746TER
2022
10 cores / 20 threads, 67 Watt
9.74
Apple M4 (8 cores)
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 5 Watt
12.93
+32.8%

Apple M4 (8 cores) outperforms Xeon D-1746TER by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking902674
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency5.62100.00
DesignerIntelApple
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameIce Lake-D (2022−2023)no data
Release date24 February 2022 (3 years ago)28 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,069no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1746TER and M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores10no data
Threads208
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache15 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1746TER and M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA2227no data
Power consumption (TDP)67 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1746TER and M4 (8 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-1746TER and M4 (8 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1746TER and M4 (8 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1746TER and M4 (8 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 8-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1746TER and M4 (8 cores).

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon D-1746TER 9.74
Apple M4 (8 cores) 12.93
+32.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon D-1746TER 15660
Apple M4 (8 cores) 20795
+32.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.74 12.93
Recency 24 February 2022 28 October 2024
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 67 Watt 5 Watt

Xeon D-1746TER has 25% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Apple M4 (8 cores), on the other hand, has a 32.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1240% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 (8 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon D-1746TER in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1746TER is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 (8 cores) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1746TER
Xeon D-1746TER
Apple M4 (8 cores)
M4 (8 cores)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1746TER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 39 votes

Rate M4 (8 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon D-1746TER and M4 (8 cores), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.