Ultra 5 245KF vs Xeon D-1736NT

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1736NT
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 67 Watt
11.22
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.83
+148%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms Xeon D-1736NT by a whopping 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking691168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.13
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency15.8521.07
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 January 2022 (2 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1614
Base clock speed2.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA22271851
Power consumption (TDP)67 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620
USB revision3.0no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1736NT 11.22
Ultra 5 245KF 27.83
+148%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1736NT 17826
Ultra 5 245KF 44203
+148%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.22 27.83
Recency 1 January 2022 24 October 2024
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 16 14
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 67 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon D-1736NT has 14.3% more threads, and 86.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has a 148% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 75% more physical cores, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1736NT in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1736NT is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1736NT and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1736NT
Xeon D-1736NT
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1736NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1736NT or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.