Ultra 7 265F vs Xeon D-1715TER

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1163not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency10.83no data
Architecture codenameIce Lake-D (2022−2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date24 February 2022 (2 years ago)7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-cores48
Efficient-coresno data12
Threads820
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2227FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size384 GB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 February 2022 7 January 2025
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon D-1715TER has 30% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon D-1715TER is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1715TER
Xeon D-1715TER
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1715TER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1715TER or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.