Atom x7211E vs Xeon D-1715TER
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-1715TER outperforms Atom x7211E by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1201 | 2173 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 10.87 | 25.35 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) | Gracemont (2023) |
| Release date | 24 February 2022 (3 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-1715TER and Atom x7211E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Performance-cores | 4 | no data |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 10 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-1715TER and Atom x7211E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2227 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Atom x7211E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-1715TER and Atom x7211E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Atom x7211E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Atom x7211E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 384 GB | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Atom x7211E.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 9 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 24 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.68 | 1.59 |
| Recency | 24 February 2022 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 6 Watt |
Xeon D-1715TER has a 257.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Atom x7211E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon D-1715TER is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7211E in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon D-1715TER is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7211E is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
