EPYC 7413 vs Xeon D-1627

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated127
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.04
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon DAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data16.63
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$202$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier2926.5
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size246.24 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1667SP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
AMTSPS 3.0no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Quiet System-no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413.

PCIe version2.0/3.04.0
PCI Express lanes32128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x 10 GBEno data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon D-1627 has 300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1627 and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1627
Xeon D-1627
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1627 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1627 or EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.