Ultra 9 285K vs Xeon D-1602

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1602
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 27 Watt
1.55
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
42.99
+2674%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Xeon D-1602 by a whopping 2674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking213254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.1374.22
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency5.4332.55
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$106$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285K has 512% better value for money than Xeon D-1602.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads424
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rateno data250 MHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size246.24 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
AMTSPS 3.0no data
Quiet System-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version2.0/3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes3220
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1602 1.55
Ultra 9 285K 42.99
+2674%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1602 2459
Ultra 9 285K 68291
+2677%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 42.99
Recency 2 April 2019 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon D-1602 has 363% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 2673.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1100% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1602 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1602 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1602 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1602
Xeon D-1602
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1602 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 170 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1602 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.