Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon D-1587

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1587
2016, $1,443
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
7.73
+3.8%
Ryzen 5 2600
2018, $199
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.45

Xeon D-1587 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10951134
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.645.82
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon DAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency12.7612.30
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
Release date24 February 2016 (9 years ago)19 April 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,443$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 809% better value for money than Xeon D-1587.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1587 and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1734
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size306.18 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1587 and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1667AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1587 and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1587 and Ryzen 5 2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1587 and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1587 and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1587 and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe version2.0/3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2420
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon D-1587 7.73
+3.8%
Ryzen 5 2600 7.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon D-1587 13630
+3.7%
Samples: 12
Ryzen 5 2600 13144
Samples: 14751

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.73 7.45
Recency 24 February 2016 19 April 2018
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

Xeon D-1587 has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 2600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon D-1587 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600.

Be aware that Xeon D-1587 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1587
Xeon D-1587
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1587 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 16548 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon D-1587 and Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.