Xeon Platinum 8362 vs D-1541

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1541
2015
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
6.36
+10.6%
Xeon Platinum 8362
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 265 Watt
5.75

Xeon D-1541 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10551121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.76no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency13.322.04
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 November 2015 (9 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$581no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C81 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt265 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362.

PCIe version2.0/3.04.0
PCI Express lanes2464
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1541 6.36
+10.6%
Xeon Platinum 8362 5.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1541 10064
+10.5%
Xeon Platinum 8362 9107

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.36 5.75
Recency 1 November 2015 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 265 Watt

Xeon D-1541 has a 10.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 488.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8362, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon D-1541 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8362 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1541 and Xeon Platinum 8362, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1541
Xeon D-1541
Intel Xeon Platinum 8362
Xeon Platinum 8362

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon D-1541 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8362 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1541 or Xeon Platinum 8362, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.