Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon D-1528

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1528
2015, $320
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
3.87
+16.6%
Ryzen Embedded R2314
2022
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.32

Xeon D-1528 outperforms Ryzen Embedded R2314 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16041736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.71no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency11.8523.71
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date1 November 2015 (10 years ago)21 June 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$320no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1528 and Ryzen Embedded R2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size246.24 mm2210 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 million4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1528 and Ryzen Embedded R2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1528 and Ryzen Embedded R2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1528 and Ryzen Embedded R2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1528 and Ryzen Embedded R2314 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1528 and Ryzen Embedded R2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1528 and Ryzen Embedded R2314.

PCIe version2.0/3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2416
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon D-1528 3.87
+16.6%
Ryzen Embedded R2314 3.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon D-1528 6823
+16.6%
Samples: 8
Ryzen Embedded R2314 5850
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.87 3.32
Recency 1 November 2015 21 June 2022
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon D-1528 has a 16.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen Embedded R2314, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon D-1528 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1528 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded R2314 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1528
Xeon D-1528
AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314
Ryzen Embedded R2314

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-1528 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded R2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon D-1528 and Ryzen Embedded R2314, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.