Ryzen 7 9700X vs Xeon Bronze 3408U

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Bronze 3408U
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
6.04
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.59
+291%

Ryzen 7 9700X outperforms Xeon Bronze 3408U by a whopping 291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1091217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.5550.95
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.5534.20
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$425$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 9700X has 85% better value for money than Xeon Bronze 3408U.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache22.5 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data8,315 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677AM5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4000DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes8024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Bronze 3408U 6.04
Ryzen 7 9700X 23.59
+291%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Bronze 3408U 9557
Ryzen 7 9700X 37332
+291%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.04 23.59
Recency 10 January 2023 8 August 2024
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 9700X has a 290.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 9700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3408U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Bronze 3408U is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 9700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3408U and Ryzen 7 9700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U
Xeon Bronze 3408U
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3408U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 206 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 9700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Bronze 3408U or Ryzen 7 9700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.