i9-13900TE vs Xeon Bronze 3206R

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Bronze 3206R
2020
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
6.80
Core i9-13900TE
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 35 Watt
9.96
+46.5%

Core i9-13900TE outperforms Xeon Bronze 3206R by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1022771
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.5726.93
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA36471700
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Bronze 3206R 6.80
i9-13900TE 9.96
+46.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Bronze 3206R 10797
i9-13900TE 15819
+46.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.80 9.96
Recency 1 January 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 35 Watt

i9-13900TE has a 46.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 142.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3206R in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Bronze 3206R is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i9-13900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3206R
Xeon Bronze 3206R
Intel Core i9-13900TE
Core i9-13900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3206R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Core i9-13900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Bronze 3206R or Core i9-13900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.