Celeron 817 vs Xeon Bronze 3106
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1753 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.53 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Bronze | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 4.11 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (8 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $306 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon Bronze 3106 and Celeron 817 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 17 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 11 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 77 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 504 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Bronze 3106 and Celeron 817 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3106 and Celeron 817. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Bronze 3106 and Celeron 817 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3106 and Celeron 817 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3106 and Celeron 817. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3106 and Celeron 817.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 17 Watt |
Xeon Bronze 3106 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 817, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Bronze 3106 and Intel Celeron 817. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Bronze 3106 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 817 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
