Xeon Gold 6338N vs 7120M
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 187 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | no data | 13.56 |
Architecture codename | Tulsa (2006) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
Release date | August 2006 (18 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 64 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 0 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 48 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 435 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 60 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 83 °C |
Number of transistors | 1328 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | PPGA604 | FCLGA4189 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | + | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-2667 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
Threads | 4 | 64 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 185 Watt |
Xeon 7120M has 94.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6338N, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 7120M and Xeon Gold 6338N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.