EPYC 9016 vs Xeon 698X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Venice (2004−2026)
Release date2 February 2026 (less than a year ago)23 July 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699$700

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon 698X and EPYC 9016: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores868 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores86no data
Threads17216
Base clock speed2 GHz3.05 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache336 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm2 nm
Die size2x 598 mm28x 76 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 698X and EPYC 9016 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4710SP8
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 698X and EPYC 9016. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 698X and EPYC 9016 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 698X and EPYC 9016 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 698X and EPYC 9016. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s)DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 698X and EPYC 9016.

PCIe version5.06.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2026 23 July 2026
Physical cores 86 8
Threads 172 16
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon 698X has 975% more physical cores and 975% more threads.

EPYC 9016, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 169% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 698X and AMD EPYC 9016. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 698X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9016 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 698X and EPYC 9016, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.