EPYC Embedded 9355 vs Xeon 6970E+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Clearwater Forest (2026) | Turin (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 31 May 2026 (less than a year ago) | 11 March 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon 6970E+ and EPYC Embedded 9355: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 192 | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 192 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.55 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per module) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 480 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 66,520 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6970E+ and EPYC Embedded 9355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | 7529 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6970E+ and EPYC Embedded 9355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 6970E+ and EPYC Embedded 9355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6970E+ and EPYC Embedded 9355 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6970E+ and EPYC Embedded 9355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6970E+ and EPYC Embedded 9355.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 May 2026 | 11 March 2025 |
| Physical cores | 192 | 32 |
| Threads | 192 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 280 Watt |
Xeon 6970E+ has an age advantage of 1 year, 500% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 33% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC Embedded 9355, on the other hand, has 43% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 6970E+ and AMD EPYC Embedded 9355. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
