Xeon 6780E vs 696X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 696X
2026, $5,599
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
64.44
+30.2%
Xeon 6780E
2024, $11,350
144 cores / 144 threads, 330 Watt
49.51

Xeon 696X outperforms Xeon 6780E by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.981.28
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.786.34
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date2 February 2026 (recently)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,599$11,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 696X has 602% better value for money than Xeon 6780E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 696X and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)144
Performance-cores64no data
Threads128144
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache336 MB (shared)108 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size2x 598 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C85 °C
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 696X and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4710FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 696X and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon 696X and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX-+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 696X and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 696X and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s)DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 696X and Xeon 6780E.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12888

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 696X 64.44
+30.2%
Xeon 6780E 49.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 696X 112888
+30.2%
Samples: 1
Xeon 6780E 86734
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 64.44 49.51
Recency 2 February 2026 3 June 2024
Physical cores 64 144
Threads 128 144
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 330 Watt

Xeon 696X has a 30.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has 125% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads, and 6.1% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 696X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6780E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 696X
Xeon 696X
Intel Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 696X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 18 votes

Rate Xeon 6780E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 696X and Xeon 6780E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.