Processor N95 vs Xeon 696X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 696X
2026, $5,599
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
64.44
+2138%

Xeon 696X outperforms Processor N95 by a whopping 2138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking251902
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.98no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency7.788.11
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date2 February 2026 (recently)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,599no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 696X and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-cores64no data
Threads1284
Base clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache336 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm10 nm
Die size2x 598 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 696X and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4710Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 696X and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 696X and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 696X and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 696X and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s)DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 696X and Processor N95.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes1289

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 64.44 2.88
Recency 2 February 2026 3 January 2023
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 4
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon 696X has a 2137.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

Processor N95, on the other hand, has 2233.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 696X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N95 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 696X is a server/workstation processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 696X
Xeon 696X
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 696X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1015 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 696X and Processor N95, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.