i9-10900X vs Xeon 678X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 678X
2026, $3,749
48 cores / 96 threads, 300 Watt
52.59
+312%

Xeon 678X outperforms Core i9-10900X by a whopping 312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking47690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.15no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.403.27
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Cascade Lake-X (2019)
Release date2 February 2026 (recently)19 October 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,749no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 678X and Core i9-10900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-cores48no data
Threads9620
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/s8 GT/s DMI3 MHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache192 MB (shared)19.25 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm14 nm
Die size2x 598 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data94 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)82 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 678X and Core i9-10900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4710FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 678X and Core i9-10900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon 678X and Core i9-10900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 678X and Core i9-10900X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 678X and Core i9-10900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s)DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size4 TB256 GB
Max memory channels84
Maximum memory bandwidthno data94 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 678X and Core i9-10900X.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 678X 52.59
+312%
i9-10900X 12.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 678X 92125
+312%
Samples: 1
i9-10900X 22365
Samples: 860

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.59 12.77
Recency 2 February 2026 19 October 2019
Physical cores 48 10
Threads 96 20
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon 678X has a 311.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 380% more physical cores and 380% more threads.

i9-10900X, on the other hand, has 81.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 678X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i9-10900X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 678X is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-10900X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 678X
Xeon 678X
Intel Core i9-10900X
Core i9-10900X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 678X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 1019 votes

Rate Core i9-10900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 678X and Core i9-10900X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.