3015Ce vs Xeon 678X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 678X
2026, $3,749
48 cores / 96 threads, 300 Watt
52.59
+4283%

Xeon 678X outperforms 3015Ce by a whopping 4283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking472577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.15no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency7.408.45
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date2 February 2026 (recently)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,749no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 678X and 3015Ce basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores48no data
Threads964
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache192 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm14 nm
Die size2x 598 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)82 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 678X and 3015Ce compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA4710FT5
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 678X and 3015Ce. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 678X and 3015Ce technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 678X and 3015Ce are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 678X and 3015Ce. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s)DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 678X and 3015Ce.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 678X 52.59
+4283%
3015Ce 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 678X 92125
+4289%
Samples: 1
3015Ce 2099
Samples: 52

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.59 1.20
Recency 2 February 2026 4 August 2020
Physical cores 48 2
Threads 96 4
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon 678X has a 4282.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

3015Ce, on the other hand, has 4900% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 678X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD 3015Ce in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 678X is a server/workstation processor while 3015Ce is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 678X
Xeon 678X
AMD 3015Ce
3015Ce

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 678X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 22 votes

Rate 3015Ce on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 678X and 3015Ce, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.