Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G vs Xeon 6756E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Sierra Forest (2024) | Cezanne (2021−2024) |
| Release date | 3 June 2024 (1 year ago) | 5 September 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $8,428 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6756E and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 128 | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per module) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 80 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6756E and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6756E and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6756E and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6756E and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6756E and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Vega 6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6756E and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2024 | 5 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 128 | 4 |
| Threads | 128 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon 6756E has 3100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 246.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 6756E and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 6756E is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
