Ryzen Threadripper 2900X vs Xeon 6741P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 29 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 8.07 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | August 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6741P and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 96 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 288 MB | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 79 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9600 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6741P and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6741P and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6741P and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6741P and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6741P and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5(6400MT/s) | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6741P and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 136 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 48 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon 6741P has 500% more physical cores.
Ryzen Threadripper 2900X, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 6741P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 6741P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 2900X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
