EPYC 9734 vs Xeon 6741P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9734 outperforms Xeon 6741P by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 35 | 32 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.44 | 2.69 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 8.09 | 7.25 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) | Bergamo (2023) |
| Release date | 24 February 2025 (1 year ago) | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,421 | $9,600 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon 6741P has 325% better value for money than EPYC 9734.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon 6741P and EPYC 9734: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 112 |
| Threads | 96 | 224 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 288 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 2x 598 mm2 | 8x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 71,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6741P and EPYC 9734 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 340 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6741P and EPYC 9734. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6741P and EPYC 9734 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6741P and EPYC 9734 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6741P and EPYC 9734. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5(6400MT/s) | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6741P and EPYC 9734.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 136 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 57.51 | 58.44 |
| Recency | 24 February 2025 | 13 June 2023 |
| Physical cores | 48 | 112 |
| Threads | 96 | 224 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 340 Watt |
Xeon 6741P has an age advantage of 1 year, and 13% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9734, on the other hand, has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, and 133% more physical cores and 133% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon 6741P and AMD EPYC 9734.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
