EPYC 8434PN vs Xeon 6741P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 29 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 8.07 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,150 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6741P and EPYC 8434PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 96 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 288 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 79 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6741P and EPYC 8434PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6741P and EPYC 8434PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6741P and EPYC 8434PN technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6741P and EPYC 8434PN are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6741P and EPYC 8434PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5(6400MT/s) | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6741P and EPYC 8434PN.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 136 | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2025 | 18 September 2023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 155 Watt |
Xeon 6741P has an age advantage of 1 year.
EPYC 8434PN, on the other hand, has 93.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 6741P and AMD EPYC 8434PN. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
