Xeon 676X vs 6710E
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 676X outperforms Xeon 6710E by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 136 | 52 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.94 | 12.98 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 7.22 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sierra Forest (2024) | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) |
| Release date | 3 June 2024 (2 years ago) | 2 February 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,749 | $2,499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon 676X has 63% better value for money than Xeon 6710E.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon 6710E and Xeon 676X: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 32 |
| Threads | 64 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 0 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per module) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | 144 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 598 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85 °C | 78 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6710E and Xeon 676X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 275 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6710E and Xeon 676X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 6710E and Xeon 676X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | + | - |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6710E and Xeon 676X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6710E and Xeon 676X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6710E and Xeon 676X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 35.70 | 52.20 |
| Recency | 3 June 2024 | 2 February 2026 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 275 Watt |
Xeon 6710E has 100% more physical cores, and 34% lower power consumption.
Xeon 676X, on the other hand, has a 46% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
The Intel Xeon 676X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6710E in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
