Ultra 5 225F vs Xeon 6710E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 6710E
2024
64 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
34.95
+94.9%
Core Ultra 5 225F
2025
10 cores / 10 threads, 65 Watt
17.93

Xeon 6710E outperforms Core Ultra 5 225F by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking107372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.9768.93
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.2011.65
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSierra Forest (2024)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date3 June 2024 (1 year ago)7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,749$231

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 5 225F has 431% better value for money than Xeon 6710E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6710E and Core Ultra 5 225F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data4
Threads6410
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (per module)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache96 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6710E and Core Ultra 5 225F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4710FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6710E and Core Ultra 5 225F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon 6710E and Core Ultra 5 225F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6710E and Core Ultra 5 225F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6710E and Core Ultra 5 225F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size4 TB256 GB
Max memory channels82
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6710E and Core Ultra 5 225F.

PCIe version5.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes8824

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 6710E 34.95
+94.9%
Ultra 5 225F 17.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 6710E Samples: 1 61404
+95%
Ultra 5 225F Samples: 93 31496

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.95 17.93
Recency 3 June 2024 7 January 2025
Physical cores 64 10
Threads 64 10
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon 6710E has a 94.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 540% more physical cores and 540% more threads.

Ultra 5 225F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6710E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 6710E is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 225F is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
Core Ultra 5 225F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 87 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 225F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 6710E and Core Ultra 5 225F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.