Xeon 636 vs 658X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 658X
2026, $1,699
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
42.40
+63.1%

Xeon 658X outperforms Xeon 636 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking92283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.8924.66
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.966.28
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Granite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release date2 February 2026 (less than a year ago)2 February 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699$639

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 636 has 46% better value for money than Xeon 658X.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon 658X and Xeon 636: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Performance-cores2412
Threads4824
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/s0 GT/s
L1 cache112 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache144 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size2x 598 mm2598 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C73 °C
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 658X and Xeon 636 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4710FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 658X and Xeon 636. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon 658X and Xeon 636 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 658X and Xeon 636 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 658X and Xeon 636. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)DDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory size4 TB2 TB
Max memory channels84
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 658X and Xeon 636.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 658X 42.40
+63.1%
Xeon 636 25.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 658X 72479
+63.2%
Samples: 5
Xeon 636 44421
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.40 25.99
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 170 Watt

Xeon 658X has a 63% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon 636, on the other hand, has 47% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 658X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 636 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Xeon 658X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Xeon 636 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 658X and Xeon 636, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.