EPYC 9535 vs Xeon 658X
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9535 outperforms Xeon 658X by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 101 | 25 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 25.47 | 3.59 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 6.58 | 9.20 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 2 February 2026 (recently) | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,699 | $8,992 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon 658X has 609% better value for money than EPYC 9535.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon 658X and EPYC 9535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 24 | no data |
| Threads | 48 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 0 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 144 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 2x 598 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 66,520 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 658X and EPYC 9535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 658X and EPYC 9535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 658X and EPYC 9535 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 658X and EPYC 9535 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 658X and EPYC 9535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5(6400MT/s) | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 658X and EPYC 9535.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 38.99 | 65.44 |
| Recency | 2 February 2026 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 64 |
| Threads | 48 | 128 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
Xeon 658X has an age advantage of 1 year, and 20% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9535, on the other hand, has a 67.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.
The AMD EPYC 9535 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 658X in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
