i5-13600KF vs Xeon 658X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 658X
2026, $1,699
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
38.95
+82.4%
Core i5-13600KF
2022, $294
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
21.35

Xeon 658X outperforms Core i5-13600KF by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking99327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.4765.18
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency6.587.21
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date2 February 2026 (recently)27 September 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13600KF has 156% better value for money than Xeon 658X.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 658X and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-cores246
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads4820
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rate0 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache144 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 598 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 658X and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4710FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 658X and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon 658X and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 658X and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 658X and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 658X and Core i5-13600KF.

PCIe version5.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 658X 38.95
+82.4%
i5-13600KF 21.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 658X 68239
+82.4%
Samples: 2
i5-13600KF 37405
Samples: 3997

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.95 21.35
Recency 2 February 2026 27 September 2022
Physical cores 24 14
Threads 48 20
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon 658X has a 82.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 71.4% more physical cores and 140% more threads.

i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 658X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i5-13600KF in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 658X is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 658X
Xeon 658X
Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 658X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2516 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 658X and Core i5-13600KF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.