Celeron 1007U vs Xeon 658X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 658X
2026, $1,699
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
38.99
+8023%

Xeon 658X outperforms Celeron 1007U by a whopping 8023% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1013199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.47no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency6.581.19
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date2 February 2026 (less than a year ago)20 January 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores24no data
Threads482
Base clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI
Bus rate0 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache144 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm22 nm
Die size2x 598 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4710FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)DDR3
Maximum memory size4 TB32 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 658X 38.99
+8023%
Celeron 1007U 0.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 658X 68239
+8033%
Samples: 2
Celeron 1007U 839
Samples: 761

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.99 0.48
Recency 2 February 2026 20 January 2013
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon 658X has a 8023% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

Celeron 1007U, on the other hand, has 1371% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 658X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 1007U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 658X is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 1007U is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Xeon 658X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 159 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 658X and Celeron 1007U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.