Xeon 5140 vs 6517P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 6517P
2025, $1,195
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
28.03
+5620%

Xeon 6517P outperforms Xeon 5140 by a whopping 5620% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2133175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.524.27
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.230.32
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2025)Woodcrest (2006)
Release date24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)June 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,195$15

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6517P has 474% better value for money than Xeon 5140.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6517P and Xeon 5140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads322
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.33 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)0 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache72 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data65 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno dataB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6517P and Xeon 5140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4710LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6517P and Xeon 5140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 6517P and Xeon 5140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
SGX+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6517P and Xeon 5140 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6517P and Xeon 5140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)DDR2
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6517P and Xeon 5140.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes88no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 6517P 28.03
+5620%
Xeon 5140 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 6517P 49099
+5629%
Samples: 6
Xeon 5140 857
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.03 0.49
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 2
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon 6517P has a 5620.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Xeon 5140, on the other hand, has 192.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6517P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 5140 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6517P
Xeon 6517P
Intel Xeon 5140
Xeon 5140

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6517P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon 5140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 6517P and Xeon 5140, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.